Planning appeal decision
Land North of Braeburn Way, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0EH
Planning appeal 3267704 at Land North of Braeburn Way, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0EH (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 15 July 2021 by Inspector Gilbert J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character, appearance and landscape of the site and the surrounding area.
outline application for the erection of up to 180 dwellings together with open space, landscaping, drainage features and associated infrastructure. Detailed approval is sought for principal means of access from Eight Acres, with all other matters reserved
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Gilbert J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character, appearance and landscape of the site and the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers of Harcourt, High Street and Braeburn Way, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposed development on existing and planned operations at the adjacent airport
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to noise
- the effect of the proposed development on local infrastructure provision
- whether the Council can demonstrate a five year housing land supply
- the overall planning balance
What decided it
The unacceptable and unmitigated harm to highway safety and to the living conditions of existing occupiers of Harcourt, High Street and Braeburn Way from increased and re-routed traffic movements outweighed the housing and other benefits under the tilted balance.
the significant weight attributed to the housing, affordable housing, self-build and economic benefits was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial weight given to the adverse impacts on highway safety and on existing residents' living conditions, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply and the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM4Policy CS16Policy DM3Policy DM14Policy DM16Policy CS18Policy CS14Policy DM17Policy CS2Policy CS7Policy CS1Policy CS5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 61Paragraph 73Paragraph 80Paragraph 91Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 110Paragraph 117Paragraph 127Paragraph 170Paragraph 180Paragraph 182
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL 1982]; Holborn Studios Ltd v London Borough of Hackney [EWHC 2823 (Admin)]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 October 20266009734Whitewood Corner, 7 Drove Road, Gamlingay, Sandy, SG19 2HT
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed9 October 2026601067023A High Street North, Dunstable, LU6 1HX
- Allowed9 September 202660109292 Palma Close, Dunstable, LU6 1BU
- Dismissed8 September 20266009181Bracken Ley, London Road, Houghton Conquest, MK45 3LP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®