Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20213267745

Flat 1, 382 Caledonian Road, London, N1 1DY

Planning appeal 3267745 at Flat 1, 382 Caledonian Road, London, N1 1DY (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 28 June 2021 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, terrace and the Barnsbury Conservation Area.

a rear extension to existing flat within part of existing courtyard

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
N1 1DY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, terrace and the Barnsbury Conservation Area
  • the living conditions of occupiers of adjoining properties with particular regard to noise and privacy

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the host building, terrace and conservation area, with no public benefits to outweigh the less-than-substantial harm identified.

The less-than-substantial harm to the Barnsbury Conservation Area was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the additional living space would be private in nature only.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS9 of the Islington Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2.1 of the Islington Local Plan Development Management Policies (2013)Policy DM2.3 of the Islington Local Plan Development Management Policies (2013)Policy D1 of the London Plan 2021Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 193Paragraph 196
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 849 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  3. Notice varied and upheld10 September 20263355155
    204 Blackstock Road , London, N5 1EN
  4. Dismissed28 August 20266002628
    72 Prebend Street, London, N1 8PR
  5. Dismissed4 March 20263373331
    72 Prebend Street, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.