Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213267957

4 Mobberley Road, Knutsford, WA16 8EF

the erection of two dwellings and associated access

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cryan M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed development on open space
  • The effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Cross Town (Knutsford) Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would result in the loss of a designated open space and cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to justify approval.

The moderate social and economic benefits of providing two new dwellings and construction activity, together with modest public benefits from tree works and an interpretation board, do not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area heritage asset, to which great weight must be attributed, and the conflict with development plan policies protecting open space.

Framework references: 101, 103, 189, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy RT1 of the Macclesfield Local Plan, Policy SE6 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, Policy SE7 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, Policy E4 of the Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan, Policy HE2 of the Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan, Policy HE3 of the Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan, Policy D1 of the Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan, Emerging Policy REC1 of the Publication Draft Site Allocations and Development Policies Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.