Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision17 August 20213268054

52 Maryland, HATFIELD, AL10 8DX

front and rear extension in conjunction with No 50 Maryland (under separate application)

Authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 50 Maryland in terms of outlook and on the character and appearance of the host dwelling

What decided it

The absence of a legally binding agreement to ensure the rear extension would be built in conjunction with the neighbouring property's extension meant the harm to neighbouring outlook could not be satisfactorily mitigated, necessitating dismissal of that element.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy SADM11, Policy SP9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.