Planning appeal decision
The Paddocks, 24 Totteridge Common, London, N20 8NE
Planning appeal 3268611 at The Paddocks, 24 Totteridge Common, London, N20 8NE (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 28 September 2021 by Inspector Tweddle J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
single storey rear extension and new glazed extension and enlarged corridor, enlarge existing window opening following removal of existing bay window extension and rear corridor extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Tweddle J
- Postcode
- N20 8NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the development would preserve a Grade II listed building, former stable block to Totteridge Park, and any features of special interest that the building possesses, and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Totteridge Conservation Area
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative disproportionate addition to the original building when combined with previous extensions, coupled with the failure to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed building, with no public benefits to outweigh the identified harm, meant the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate Green Belt development were not established.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with the less than substantial but materially significant harm to the listed building (to which great weight must be given), was not outweighed by any public benefits or other material considerations, and therefore the very special circumstances test was not satisfied.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM15Policy DM01Policy DM06Policy CS5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Barnet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed20 May 20263354231The Spinney, 22 Hendon Wood Lane, London, NW7 4HR
- Dismissed29 April 20266003015Powerleague Barnet, Bobby Moore Way, Muswell Hill, Barnet, N10 1ST
- Allowed28 April 20266001871West End House Cottage,, 58 Totteridge Common,, London,, N20 8LZ
- Dismissed10 April 20266000763Colebrook Court, Kitts End Road, Barnet, EN5 4QG
- Notice varied and upheld16 December 20253349499137 Marsh Lane, London, NW7 4EY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®