Planning appeal decision
Hampstead Gravelye Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, RH16 2SL
Planning appeal 3268734 at Hampstead Gravelye Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, RH16 2SL (Mid Sussex District Council) was allowed on 11 November 2021 by Inspector Cliff D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would accord with the Council's strategy for residential development.
described in the application form as ‘new 3 bedroom bungalow with associated vehicle access on land at Hampstead
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cliff D
- Postcode
- RH16 2SL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would accord with the Council's strategy for residential development
- the effect upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect upon the setting of the Grade II listed building at Criplands House
What decided it
The emerging DPD proposing to revise the settlement boundary to include the appeal site, combined with the substantial amount of recently approved residential development in the vicinity outside the current boundary, significantly reduced the weight to be given to the conflict with development plan policies and tipped the balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
The limited harm arising from conflict with the development plan policies, coupled with the emerging DPD, the substantial amount of newly approved development in the locality outside the settlement boundary, and the modest contribution to housing supply, outweighed the conflict with Policies DP6, DP12 and DP15.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP6Policy DP15Policy DP12Policy DP26Policy DP34Policy 1 of the Lindfield and Lindfield Rural Neighbourhood Plan (2016)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 196
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed10 September 20266011079Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
- Notice varied and upheld6 July 20263376721Land Fir Trees Place, Turners Hill Road, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HQ
- Dismissed30 April 20266002774Rocklands, Church Lane, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6UP
- Allowed16 September 20253363187Land Adjacent to Hilgay Cottage , Birchwood Grove, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
- Allowed20 August 20253366246Firs Farm, Copthorne Common, Copthorne, West Sussex, RH10 3LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®