Planning appeal decision
No1 The Creek, Lower Sunbury, Sunbury-on-Thames, TW16 6BY
Planning appeal 3268858 at No1 The Creek, Lower Sunbury, Sunbury-on-Thames, TW16 6BY (Spelthorne Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 May 2022 by Inspector Davies B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on openness and the purpose of the Green Belt.
the replacement of existing 1920s single storey dwelling with new single storey 4 bed dwelling on amended footprint
- Authority
- Spelthorne Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Davies B
- Postcode
- TW16 6BY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on openness and the purpose of the Green Belt
- whether or not the proposal would comply with planning policy that seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding
- the effect of the proposal on flood risk
- the effect on character and appearance of the area and river setting
- if the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify development
What decided it
The development as a whole amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt due to the garage and extensive engineering operations harming openness, combined with unresolved flood risk policy conflicts and harm to the river setting, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy EN1Policy EN2Policy EN9Policy LO1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 119Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 162Paragraph 167
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Spelthorne Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice varied and upheld13 May 20263345013Land to the South of Bedfont Road, Stanwell, Staines, TW19 7LE
- Dismissed17 March 20263375737Former Fordbridge Service Station, Kingston Road, Ashford, TW15 3SE
- Dismissed30 January 20263375599Plot 2, Sandhills Meadow , Shepperton, TW17 9HY
- Dismissed26 January 20263348103Land South East of The Ranges (Addressed As 1A Priory Stables), Chertsey Road, Shepperton, TW17 9NU
- Notice varied and upheld26 January 202633351271A Priory Stables, Shepperton, TW17 9NU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®