Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 January 20233268916

Land South of The Stables, Scant Road East, Hambrook, West Ashling, Chichester, West Sussex, PO18 8UB

Planning appeal 3268916 at Land South of The Stables, Scant Road East, Hambrook, West Ashling, Chichester, West Sussex, PO18 8UB (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 6 January 2023 by Inspector Gilbert J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for two gypsy families, including the laying of hardstanding, erection of boundary wall and, construction of two ancillary amenity buildings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Gilbert J
Postcode
PO18 8UB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area, with regard to recreational disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area, with regard to nutrient neutrality
  • the effect of the proposal on groundwater sources
  • the appropriateness of the location for the proposal in the countryside, having regard to access to local services and facilities
  • whether the proposal, together with nearby gypsy and traveller sites, would dominate the settled community
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regard to outdoor space
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • whether any harm identified, including conflict with the development plan, would be outweighed by other considerations

What decided it

The unresolved and unsecured Habitats Regulations mitigation for recreational disturbance and nutrient neutrality on the SPA, combined with harm to character and appearance and groundwater, outweighed the benefits of the proposal.

Significant weight given to unmet pitch need, lack of alternative sites and personal circumstances was outweighed by moderate harm to character and appearance and substantial harm to recreational disturbance, nutrient neutrality and groundwater, tipping the balance against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 33Policy 45Policy 48Policy 50Policy 42Policy 36Policy 39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 180Paragraph 181Paragraph 105Paragraph 111

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

71 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266009623
    Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266010948
    Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
  3. Dismissed5 October 20266011850
    8 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011615
    1, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
  5. Allowed30 September 20266014666
    Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.