Planning appeal decision
Land South of The Stables, Scant Road East, Hambrook, West Ashling, Chichester, West Sussex, PO18 8UB
Planning appeal 3268916 at Land South of The Stables, Scant Road East, Hambrook, West Ashling, Chichester, West Sussex, PO18 8UB (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 6 January 2023 by Inspector Gilbert J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for two gypsy families, including the laying of hardstanding, erection of boundary wall and, construction of two ancillary amenity buildings
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Gilbert J
- Postcode
- PO18 8UB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area, with regard to recreational disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area, with regard to nutrient neutrality
- the effect of the proposal on groundwater sources
- the appropriateness of the location for the proposal in the countryside, having regard to access to local services and facilities
- whether the proposal, together with nearby gypsy and traveller sites, would dominate the settled community
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regard to outdoor space
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether any harm identified, including conflict with the development plan, would be outweighed by other considerations
What decided it
The unresolved and unsecured Habitats Regulations mitigation for recreational disturbance and nutrient neutrality on the SPA, combined with harm to character and appearance and groundwater, outweighed the benefits of the proposal.
Significant weight given to unmet pitch need, lack of alternative sites and personal circumstances was outweighed by moderate harm to character and appearance and substantial harm to recreational disturbance, nutrient neutrality and groundwater, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 33Policy 45Policy 48Policy 50Policy 42Policy 36Policy 39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 180Paragraph 181Paragraph 105Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed23 October 20266009623Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
- Dismissed15 October 20266010948Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
- Dismissed5 October 202660118508 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
- Dismissed2 October 202660116151, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
- Allowed30 September 20266014666Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®