Planning appeal decision
Land at The Street, The Street, Chipperfield, Hertfordshire, WD4 9BH
Planning appeal 3269008 at Land at The Street, The Street, Chipperfield, Hertfordshire, WD4 9BH (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 November 2021 by Inspector Britnell S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant policies of the Development Plan.
development of two dwellings, together with garaging and driveways
- Authority
- Dacorum Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Britnell S
- Postcode
- WD4 9BH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant policies of the Development Plan
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Chipperfield Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II* Listed The Pale Farm
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants at the Old Barn Cottage, with particular regard to privacy and outlook
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it
What decided it
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with less than substantial harm to heritage assets, which together were not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of two dwellings.
The limited housing and economic benefits of two dwellings were outweighed by substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, and less than substantial harm to the conservation area and listed building settings, with no public benefits sufficient to justify the heritage harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy CS6CS Policy CS27CS Policy CS12CS Policy CS13Saved Policy 119Saved Policy 120Appendix 3Appendix 5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Wheatcroft
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dacorum
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed26 October 20266003892Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
- Dismissed2 October 20266011489Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
- Dismissed28 August 20266010273118 A Hempstead Road, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AL
- Notice upheld14 July 20263350930Land Adjancet to The Old Brickworks, Spring Garden Lane, Northchurch, Herts, HP4 3GY
- Dismissed17 June 20266006042Land South of A4251 (North of A41), Tring, HP23 5RB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®