Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 July 20213269707

North of 35 Jarvis Gate, Sutton St James, Spalding, Lincs, PE12 0EP

Planning appeal 3269707 at North of 35 Jarvis Gate, Sutton St James, Spalding, Lincs, PE12 0EP (South Holland District Council) was dismissed on 5 July 2021 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.

residential development - 3 No plots including accesses and field access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dyer I
Postcode
PE12 0EP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • Whether the site is a suitable location for three new dwellings with particular regard to local policy for the provision of housing
  • Whether the site would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular reference to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The significant harm to rural character and appearance, combined with the unsuitability of the location under the spatial strategy and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions due to noise disturbance, outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery.

the limited benefits of delivering three homes and supporting local services were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, conflict with the spatial strategy, and failure to provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 1Policy 2Policy 3Policy 30
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 127Paragraph 78Paragraph 79Paragraph 170

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Holland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed27 April 20266001659
    Land at Fendyke Farm, Off Old Fendyke, Sutton St James, PE12 0LX
  2. Dismissed12 March 20266001983
    Merkur Slots, 32-33 Hall Place, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 1SG
  3. Dismissed12 March 20263372173
    Little London, Long Sutton, PE12 9LE
  4. Allowed3 February 20263372791
    Caudwell Farm , Holbeach St Matthews, PE12 8EW
  5. Allowed22 August 20253358030
    The Smallholding, Green Dyke, Lutton, Long Sutton, Lincolnshire, PE12 9LW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.