Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 November 20213269715

Land Southwest of Rivaside, Maltings Road, Battlesbridge, SS11 7RH

creation of vehicular access and gates

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Pannell G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including its effects on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant harm to openness, to which substantial weight must be given, was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight afforded to other material considerations.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including security concerns and fallback position, which were given limited weight.

Framework references: 136, 148, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy DM6, Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.