®Planning appeal decision
Land Southwest of Rivaside, Maltings Road, Battlesbridge, SS11 7RH
Planning appeal 3269715 at Land Southwest of Rivaside, Maltings Road, Battlesbridge, SS11 7RH (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 November 2021 by Inspector Pannell G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including its effects on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it.
creation of vehicular access and gates
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Pannell G
- Postcode
- SS11 7RH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including its effects on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant harm to openness, to which substantial weight must be given, was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight afforded to other material considerations.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including security concerns and fallback position, which were given limited weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM6Policy DM10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 136Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
- Dismissed28 July 20266007350Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
- Dismissed18 May 20266006009Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
- Allowed1 May 20266005305Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
- Allowed1 May 20266005303Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.