Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 May 20266006009

EMILIE, STOCK ROAD, INGATESTONE, CM4 9PQ

the demolition of an existing dwelling, and the construction of a new replacement detached C3 dwelling

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Whitfield H
Postcode
CM4 9PQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected species, with particular regard to bats
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness, combined with unresolved concerns about adverse effects on protected species, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh these harms to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DM6, Policy S11, Policy DM16

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.