Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 August 20213269954

Lordship Lane Service Station, Lordship Lane, Wood Green, London, N22 5LE

Planning appeal 3269954 at Lordship Lane Service Station, Lordship Lane, Wood Green, London, N22 5LE (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 24 August 2021 by Inspector Nilsson A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

replacement of 16m high mast and existing equipment cabinets with upgraded 20m high slimline mast supporting antennas and dishes, 7No. new cabinets at ground-level, plus ancillary development

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Nilsson A
Postcode
N22 5LE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of occupants of 569-571 Lordship Lane with regard to outlook

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and to neighbouring residents' outlook from the height, prominence and siting of the proposed mast outweighed the public benefits of telecommunications infrastructure provision.

The public benefits of the installation in terms of enhancement of the telecommunications network, contribution to economic growth and operational needs of the operators did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance of the area and living conditions of surrounding residents.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP11 of Haringey's Local Plan – Strategic Policies (2017)Policy DM1 of Haringey's Local Plan – Development Management DPD (2017)Policy DM3 of Haringey's Local Plan – Development Management DPD (2017)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

528 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 July 20266010205
    Stroud Green Road,Outside No 100, Haringey, London, N4 3EF
  2. Dismissed9 June 20266005218
    Outside Nos. 560-568 High Road, London, N17 6SB
  3. Dismissed9 June 20266005216
    Outside Nos. 560-568 High Road, London, N17 6SB
  4. Dismissed8 June 20266004039
    Myddleton Road, Outside No.79, London, N22 8NE
  5. Dismissed8 June 20266004037
    Myddleton Road, Outside No.79, London, N22 8NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.