Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20213269959

95 Gorse Hill, BRISTOL, BS16 4PL

`Replacement of an existing garage with annex for elderly visitors

Authority
Bristol City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ford C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the wider area
  • whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for occupants of the host property with regard to private outdoor space

What decided it

The unacceptably harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host property and wider area caused by the central positioning of the annex, which would significantly undermine the distinctive sense of spaciousness and conflict with development plan policies, could not be outweighed by the limited benefit of the development given the availability of an approved fallback scheme.

The substantial harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan outweighed the limited benefit of providing accommodation for elderly visitors, particularly given the availability of an approved fallback scheme.

Plan policies cited: Policy BCS21, Policy DM21, Policy DM26, Policy DM27, Policy DM30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.