Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20213270034

Rear of 1 and 3 Eastcourt Road, Gaisford, Worthing, BN14 7DA

Planning appeal 3270034 at Rear of 1 and 3 Eastcourt Road, Gaisford, Worthing, BN14 7DA (Worthing Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 June 2021 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

for the extension and conversion of a garage to form a studio residential unit with garden

Authority
Worthing Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
BN14 7DA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers
  • whether or not the site is suitable for family accommodation

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and living conditions of neighbours outweighed the benefits of housing provision where the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

the benefits associated with the construction and provision of a studio flat were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the overall adverse impacts on character and appearance and living conditions of neighbouring occupiers

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 8 of the Worthing Core Strategy 2011Policy 16 of the Worthing Core Strategy 2011saved Policy H18 of the Worthing Local Plan 2003
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 127Paragraph 61Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

107 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Worthing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266012522
    Units 1-2, 3 Meadow Road Industrial Estate, Worthing, BN11 2RU
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010518
    4 Offington Court, Worthing, BN14 9PF
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266007549
    Dolphin Court, Worthing, BN11 4DD
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266009240
    94 Marine Crescent, Worthing, BN12 4JH
  5. Dismissed30 July 20266010786
    24 Cissbury Gardens, Offington, Worthing, BN14 0DX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.