Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 September 20266007549

Dolphin Court, Worthing, BN11 4DD

Planning appeal 6007549 at Dolphin Court, Worthing, BN11 4DD (Worthing) was dismissed on 4 September 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and area.

Mansard-type roof extension to provide 4 new residential dwelling units (Class C3)

Authority
Worthing
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
A Wright
Postcode
BN11 4DD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to light, outlook and privacy

What decided it

The harmful loss of daylight and outlook to neighbouring occupiers at Dolphin Court, combined with the bulky and discordant appearance of the mansard extension, meant the benefits of four additional dwellings would not substantially outweigh the adverse effects under Policy S4 of the Framework.

The benefits of delivering four dwellings in a sustainable, accessible location with economic benefits during construction and occupation would not substantially outweigh the adverse effects of harm to the character and appearance of the area and harmful loss of daylight and outlook to neighbouring occupiers under Policy S4 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM2Policy DM5Guide to Residential Development Supplementary Planning Document 2013
Judgments
Rainbird v the Council of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2018] EWHC 657 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

91 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Worthing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed12 December 20243349199
    77 Brougham Road, Selden, Worthing, BN11 2PA
  2. Allowed29 September 20233319455
    47 Hawthorn Road, Worthing, BN14 9LT
  3. Dismissed25 January 20233297764
    Kingswood Home, 140 Heene Road, Worthing, BN11 4PJ
  4. Dismissed31 January 20223272608
    Land West of , 1 Hillview Rise, Worthing, BN14 0BT
  5. Dismissed1 October 20266012522
    Units 1-2, 3 Meadow Road Industrial Estate, Worthing, BN11 2RU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.