Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision19 July 20213270073

154, High Street, Ingatestone, CM4 9EZ

Planning appeal 3270073 at 154, High Street, Ingatestone, CM4 9EZ (Brentwood Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 July 2021 by Inspector Cheesley J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Ingatestone Station Lane Conservation Area.

pitched roof to porch and new front window and new boundary wall

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cheesley J
Postcode
CM4 9EZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Ingatestone Station Lane Conservation Area
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and host dwelling
  • the effect of the development on highway safety

What decided it

The boundary wall and gates caused less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area's character and appearance and created an unacceptable highway safety risk due to inadequate setback from the carriageway, outweighing any security benefit to the occupiers.

the harm to the Conservation Area's character and appearance and highway safety concerns outweighed the security benefits to the occupiers; the pitched roof porch and new front window caused no harm and were permitted

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
saved Policy CP1 (Brentwood Replacement Local Plan 2005)saved Policy C14 (Brentwood Replacement Local Plan 2005)saved Policy T2 (Brentwood Replacement Local Plan 2005)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

45 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Brentwood

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010060
    Lyches, Greenway, Hutton, Brentwood, CM13 2NR
  2. Allowed22 October 20266007755
    Land at Priests Lane, Priests Lane, Brentwood, CM15 8HG
  3. Allowed7 October 20266009911
    Place Farm, Place Farm Lane, Doddinghurst, CM15 0JA
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266008911
    Pumping Station Cottage, Great Warley Street, Brentwood, CM13 3JR
  5. Dismissed2 October 20266005177
    51 Thorndon Hall, Ingrave, CM13 3RJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.