Planning appeal decision
Warehouse Buidlings Adjacent to S J Dixon & Son Ltd , Cleveland Road, Wolverhampton, WV2 1BX
Planning appeal 3270090 at Warehouse Buidlings Adjacent to S J Dixon & Son Ltd , Cleveland Road, Wolverhampton, WV2 1BX (Wolverhampton City Council) was dismissed on 24 June 2021 by Inspector Page L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area in relation to designated and non-designated heritage assets, including any countervailing public benefits that may exist.
demolition of existing warehouse buildings and construction of Costa Coffee Drive-Through (use class A1/A3) and retail unit (use class A1) with associated parking, access, and landscaping
- Authority
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Page L
- Postcode
- WV2 1BX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area in relation to designated and non-designated heritage assets, including any countervailing public benefits that may exist
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets, when weighed against public benefits of limited to moderate weight, does not satisfy the requirements of NPPF paragraphs 196 and 197.
The less than substantial harm to heritage assets and conservation area character, when weighed against public benefits of limited to moderate weight (socio-economic benefits and addressing dilapidation), does not outweigh the great weight required by the Framework for heritage conservation; the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HE1HE4HE5HE6HE17HE19D4D5D6D7D8D9CSP4ENV2ENV3CC8CC9CA11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 193Paragraph 196Paragraph 197Paragraph 80Paragraph 118Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wolverhampton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 October 20266013350Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8QN
- Allowed26 October 20266013623Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Allowed26 October 20266013620Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Dismissed22 October 20266014499104 Woodthorne Road South, Wolverhampton, WV6 8SW
- Dismissed13 October 202660146534 Broadstone Close, Wolverhampton, WV4 5EP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®