Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld9 December 20213270218

25 Ecclestone Place, WEMBLEY, HA9 8AB

Without planning permission, the erection of a part two storey side, part two storey rear and single storey rear extensions

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Renaudon L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development alleged in each notice constitutes a breach of planning control

What decided it

In Appeal A, the commencement of the permitted development within the time limit meant the breach was one of non-compliance with conditions rather than unauthorised development, allowing for remedial works as an alternative to demolition. In Appeal B, the material change of use to three dwellings was established as a breach, but the notice was varied to avoid over-enforcement by allowing return to the previously certified two-flat use.

Judgments cited: Hussain v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 687 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.