Planning appeal decision
Chapel Fields, Loxwood Road, Alfold, Cranleigh, GU6 8HW
erection of 7 dwellings and parking areas
- Authority
- Waverley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Edwards S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the special interest of the Alfold Conservation Area, as derived from its setting
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to privacy
- Whether the proposal would increase the risk of flooding
- The effect of the proposal on protected species
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and the special interest of the Alfold Conservation Area, combined with detrimental effects on neighbouring living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply when assessed against the Framework as a whole, even in circumstances of a shortfall in five-year housing land supply.
The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, heritage setting, and neighbouring living conditions, to which very significant weight was ascribed, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and very limited weight afforded to affordable housing, assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole under paragraph 11(d)
Framework references: 11, 202
Plan policies cited: Policy RE1, Policy TD1, Policy HA1, Saved Policy D1, Saved Policy D4, Saved Policy HE8, Policy CC4, Policy NE1, Policy AHN1
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®