Planning appeal decision
Ashurst, Lickfold Road, Fernhurst, Haslemere, West Sussex, GU27 3JB
Planning appeal 3270640 at Ashurst, Lickfold Road, Fernhurst, Haslemere, West Sussex, GU27 3JB (South Downs) was dismissed on 18 August 2021 by Inspector Leonard S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to the impact on the non-designated heritage asset of the existing building, the designated heritage asset of the Fernhurst Conservation Area, and the cultural heritage of the South Downs National Park.
the demolition of the existing detached two-storey dwelling house and its replacement with a new detached two-storey dwelling house, the reinstatement of the missing walled garden, together with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- GU27 3JB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to the impact on the non-designated heritage asset of the existing building, the designated heritage asset of the Fernhurst Conservation Area, and the cultural heritage of the South Downs National Park
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the Fernhurst Conservation Area and loss of the non-designated heritage asset of the existing dwelling was not outweighed by the public benefits, particularly given the availability of a fallback extension scheme that could achieve similar design benefits with less harm.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the non-designated heritage asset, together with only modest public benefits (partial walled garden restoration and limited energy/economic/social gains), was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh those benefits, so that environmental harm outweighed the economic and social benefits and the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD30Policy SD4Policy SD5Policy SD12Policy SD15Policy SD1Policy 1 of the SDPMPPolicy 9 of the SDPMP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 176Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Downs
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 November 202433485568 Eastview Gardens Crows Lane, Upper Farringdon, Alton, GU34 3ED
- Dismissed16 February 20243322550Holmlands, Main Road, Bucks Horn Oak, Hampshire, GU10 4LT
- Allowed6 October 20233308461Land West of Ravenscroft, Storrington, West Sussex, RH20 4EH
- Dismissed30 November 20223276708Land East of New Barn Farm Lane, Blendworth, PO8 0QG
- Allowed24 February 20223278658Smiths Farm Worldham Hill, East Worldham, Alton, GU34 3AT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®