Planning appeal decision
Land West of Ravenscroft, Storrington, West Sussex, RH20 4EH
Planning appeal 3308461 at Land West of Ravenscroft, Storrington, West Sussex, RH20 4EH (South Downs) was allowed on 6 October 2023 by Inspector Hayden M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the application of policies in the Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provide a clear reason for refusing the development proposed, or whether any adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.
Hybrid application consisting of full permission for the relocation and enhancement of the Ravenscroft Allotment site and outline planning permission for up to 78 homes with all matters reserved except access (excluding internal estates roads) from Ravenscroft, and new community parkland
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hayden M
- Postcode
- RH20 4HE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the application of policies in the Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provide a clear reason for refusing the development proposed, or whether any adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the landscape to the south of Storrington and on the setting, landscape and scenic beauty of the South Downs National Park
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of nearby heritage assets, including the Storrington Conservation Area, St Joseph's Abbey Grade II listed building, and St Mary's Church Grade II* listed building
- The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar sites, with particular reference to water abstraction, taking account of the proposed water neutrality measures
- The benefits which the proposed development may bring, including housing provision and other economic, social and environmental contributions
What decided it
The substantial and significant public benefits of the scheme, particularly market and affordable housing delivery, were found to outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm and the scheme was otherwise found not to cause unacceptable landscape, ecological or other harm.
The substantial weight given to housing and affordable housing delivery, together with significant weight to economic, recreational, allotment and biodiversity benefits, outweighed the less than substantial harm to the settings of the Storrington Conservation Area and St Joseph's Abbey, such that permission was granted under both limbs of paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2(ii) SSWNPPolicy 1 SSWNPPolicy 16 HDPFPolicy 24 HDPFPolicy 25 HDPFPolicy 26 HDPFPolicy 30 HDPFPolicy 31 HDPFPolicy 32 HDPFPolicy 33 HDPFPolicy 34 HDPFPolicy 37 HDPFPolicy 38 HDPFPolicy 39 HDPFPolicy 40 HDPFPolicy 43 HDPFStrategic Policy 2 HDPFStrategic Policy 3 HDPFStrategic Policy 4 HDPFPolicy SD4 SDLPPolicy SD5 SDLPPolicy SD6 SDLPPolicy SD7 SDLPPolicy SD8 SDLPPolicy SD9 SDLPPolicy SD10 SDLPPolicy SD11 SDLPPolicy SD12 SDLPPolicy SD15 SDLPPolicy SD17 SDLPPolicy SD19 SDLPPolicy SD25 SDLPPolicy SD43 SDLPPolicy SD49 SDLPDM Policy 50 SDLPPolicy M9 WSJMLP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 74Paragraph 81Paragraph 105Paragraph 111Paragraph 162Paragraph 167Paragraph 176Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 181Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- R. (on the application of Wyatt) v Fareham BC [2022] EWCA Civ 983; WWF-UK Ltd and RSPB v SoS Scotland C.M.L.R. 1021 [1999] Env LR 632; Laura C and Others v London Borough of Camden and SoS for the Environment Transport and The Regions [2001] EWHC Admin 1116
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Downs
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed19 February 20263367125Ivy Cottage, Vernon Hill, Bishops Waltham, Hampshire, SO32 1FH
- Notice upheld9 February 20263346595Moodys Meadow, Petersfield Road, Bramdean, Hampshire, SO24 0JX
- Allowed18 December 20256000723The Sanctuary, Manor Farm Green, Twyford, Hampshire, SO21 1RA
- Allowed15 December 20253367752Hockley Golf Club, Winchester Road, Twyford, Hampshire, SO21 1PL
- Dismissed28 November 20253362628Land South of Mill Hill - Access From A283, Beach Green, Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex, BN43 5FD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®