Planning appeal decision
37 Beechfield Gardens, Romford, RM7 0EJ
Planning appeal 3270650 at 37 Beechfield Gardens, Romford, RM7 0EJ (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 12 July 2021 by Inspector McGurk N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the amenity of the occupiers of 39 Beechfield Gardens.
Demolish existing single storey rear extension. Proposed single storey rear extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- McGurk N
- Postcode
- RM7 0EJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the amenity of the occupiers of 39 Beechfield Gardens
What decided it
The combined effect of the extension's immediate proximity to the neighbour's boundary, its projection beyond the rear elevation of No 39, its height and overall scale would cause unacceptable harm to the amenity of the occupiers of No 39 through overbearing impact and loss of daylight.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Havering
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed5 August 2026336245510 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
- Dismissed5 August 20263354668145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
- Unknown4 August 2026336052322 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336052222 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
- Dismissed4 August 2026335968830 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®