Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 September 20213270684

White Hart Inn, 66 Worcester Street, Wolverhampton, WV2 4LQ

Planning appeal 3270684 at White Hart Inn, 66 Worcester Street, Wolverhampton, WV2 4LQ (Wolverhampton City Council) was dismissed on 22 September 2021 by Inspector Watson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the surrounding community with regard to the provision of meeting places.

the conversion of White Hart Inn into 7no. self contained 2 bedroom flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Watson S
Postcode
WV2 4LQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the surrounding community with regard to the provision of meeting places
  • the character and appearance of the appeal building and surrounding area, including the Worcester Street Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and locally listed building, combined with the loss of a community meeting place, outweighed the moderate benefits of providing additional housing in a location with adequate services.

The moderate benefits of housing provision and economic uplift were outweighed by the significant harm to the conservation area, locally listed building, and loss of community meeting place provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy C3 of the Wolverhampton Unitary Development Plan 2001-2011Policy CSP1 of the Black Country Core StrategyPolicy HE4 of the WUDPPolicy HE5 of the WUDPPolicy HE19 of the WUDPPolicy CSP4 of the BCCSPolicy ENV2 of the BCCS
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 197Paragraph 199

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

91 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wolverhampton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013350
    Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8QN
  2. Allowed26 October 20266013623
    Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
  3. Allowed26 October 20266013620
    Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014499
    104 Woodthorne Road South, Wolverhampton, WV6 8SW
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266014653
    4 Broadstone Close, Wolverhampton, WV4 5EP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.