Planning appeal decision
12A Church Street, North Luffenham, Oakham, LE15 8JR
Planning appeal 3270691 at 12A Church Street, North Luffenham, Oakham, LE15 8JR (Rutland County Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve the Grade II listed building of the Horse and Panniers 12A Church Street and The Bakery 12 Church Street, or any features of special architectural and/or historic character that they possess, including setting, and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the North Luffenham Conservation Area.
Application to regularise matters with regards the property being used as two separate dwellings
- Authority
- Rutland County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Edginton A
- Postcode
- LE15 8JR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would preserve the Grade II listed building of the Horse and Panniers 12A Church Street and The Bakery 12 Church Street, or any features of special architectural and/or historic character that they possess, including setting, and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the North Luffenham Conservation Area
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to overlooking
What decided it
The optimum viable use of the listed building as two dwellings, supported by evidence of floor level constraints and the impracticality of creating a single coherent dwelling, outweighed the less-than-substantial heritage harm from the boundary works, but the fixed louvres and internal courtyard wall were found to cause unacceptable harm without adequate mitigation.
The public benefits of securing the optimum viable use of the listed building (occupation, maintenance, provision of one additional dwelling, and accord with housing strategy) outweighed the less-than-substantial harm to heritage significance from the boundary walls, but the fixed louvres and internal courtyard wall caused unacceptable harm to heritage significance and living conditions that could not be justified.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS15CS19CS22SP15SP22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 16Paragraph 130Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rutland
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed12 October 20266007557Land North of Wotton Close, Ketton, PE9 3DA
- Allowed22 April 2026600403251-53 High Street East, Uppingham, Rutland, LE15 9PY
- Dismissed15 April 2026600413121 Ruddle Way, Langham, Rutland, LE15 7NZ
- Allowed15 April 20266001814Glaston Road, Rutland, Leicestershire, LE15 9DL
- Allowed17 March 20266002343Kilthorpe Grange, Barrowden Road, Ketton, Rutland, PE9 3RL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®