Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20213270819

Burnopfield Foot Clinic, Unit 5, Old Co-Op Buildings Front Street, Burnopfield, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE16 6LX

retrospective application for the installation of a shop frontage

Authority
Durham County Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Chukwujekwu I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property, which is a non-designated heritage asset, and whether it would conserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Burnopfield Conservation Area

What decided it

The uPVC shopfront fails to conserve or enhance the character and appearance of the non-designated heritage asset and conservation area, and the limited public benefits do not outweigh the less than substantial but considerable harm to heritage significance.

The less than substantial but considerable harm to the character and appearance of the heritage asset and conservation area outweighed the limited public benefits claimed from improved appearance of the building.

Framework references: 196

Plan policies cited: Policy 44 of County Durham Plan (2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.