Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 August 20213270824

Woden House, Limetree Road, Goring, Reading, RG8 9EY

Planning appeal 3270824 at Woden House, Limetree Road, Goring, Reading, RG8 9EY (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 31 August 2021 by Inspector Allen M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

the erection of a semi-detached pair of dwellings (2 x 4 bed)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Allen M
Postcode
RG8 9EY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework

What decided it

The appellant's sequential test assessment was artificially limited to a 3-mile radius without compelling evidence that the development needed to take place at this specific location, meaning the Inspector could not be satisfied that no other sequentially preferable sites were reasonably available elsewhere.

The principle of development close to the village centre with access to public transport and the economic benefits of the development did not outweigh the harm identified in relation to flood risk and failure to satisfy the sequential test.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EP4 of the South Oxfordshire Local PlanPolicy .02 of the Goring Neighbourhood Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 159

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013107
    Charleston, Bolney Road, Lower Shiplake, RG9 3NS
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266005561
    4 Spring Path, Thame, OX9 2EF
  3. Allowed26 October 20266011152
    Luffield House, 85A Wallingford Road, Goring, RG8 0HL
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266007830
    Land off Wyfold Lane, Peppard Common, RG9 5LR
  5. Allowed7 October 20266005521
    Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.