Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20223270846

1 Gleaming Wood Drive, CHATHAM, ME5 8XT

erection of 115 dwellings together with associated infrastructure, open space, landscaping and access works

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Symmons E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the open countryside
  • whether the proposal would lead to loss and deterioration of ancient woodland

What decided it

The proposal would cause direct and indirect harm to ancient woodland without wholly exceptional reasons being demonstrated, contrary to Policy DM3 and NPPF paragraph 180(c).

Although the localised harm to character and appearance could be outweighed by housing benefits including 40% affordable housing and improved woodland management, the irreplaceable nature of ancient woodland and the failure to demonstrate wholly exceptional reasons for its loss meant the conflict with ancient woodland policy could not be outweighed, and the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 11, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy SP17, Policy DM3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.