Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 December 20223271015

Ourlands, Mayles Lane, Knowle, Hampshire, PO17 5PN

Planning appeal 3271015 at Ourlands, Mayles Lane, Knowle, Hampshire, PO17 5PN (Winchester City Council) was allowed on 14 December 2022 by Inspector O'Connor H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the defined Gap between the North Fareham Strategic Development Area (SDA) and Knowle and Wickham.

the siting of an additional mobile home, touring caravan and utility dayroom

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
O'Connor H
Postcode
PO17 5PN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the defined Gap between the North Fareham Strategic Development Area (SDA) and Knowle and Wickham.
  • The effect of the proposal on the Solent Special Protection Areas and Ramsar Sites, international and nationally designated sites of importance for biodiversity in relation to both recreational and nutrient level impacts.
  • If harm arises, whether this is outweighed by other considerations including the need and supply of sites and personal circumstances.

What decided it

The substantial weight attributed to the personal circumstances of the occupants, including their medical conditions and reliance on proximity to family on the adjacent authorised pitches, outweighed the limited landscape harm.

the limited harm to the character and appearance of the area was outweighed by the serious harm that would result to the personal circumstances of the present occupants if the appeal were dismissed, and a personal permission was granted accordingly

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP18Policy CP15Policy CP16Policy DM23Policy TR6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 54
Judgments
Lisa Smith v SSLUHC [2022] EWCA Civ 1391; People over Wind and Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta ECLI:EU:C:2018:244

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Winchester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed10 August 20266005547
    Land at Lower Paddock, Bent Lane, Hambledon, PO7 4QP
  2. Allowed22 May 20266003190
    Hiawatha, Chapel Road, Swanmore, Hampshire, SO322QA
  3. Dismissed28 April 20266002399
    Anthill Farmlands, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Hampshire, PO7 6ES
  4. Dismissed11 February 20263367467
    Land at Lanham Lane, Winchester, So22 5JS
  5. Allowed19 November 20253366618
    Land at Southwick Road/School Road, Wickham, PO17 6FE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.