Planning appeal decision
Land at Lanham Lane, Winchester, So22 5JS
Planning appeal 3367467 at Land at Lanham Lane, Winchester, So22 5JS (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 11 February 2026 by Inspector Nicholls H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan settlement strategy, and to the extent relevant, the emerging development plan.
outline planning permission for up to 188 houses including custom and self build housing with all matters reserved except for access. This
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan settlement strategy, and to the extent relevant, the emerging development plan
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the ecological effects of the proposal
- whether the site is sufficiently accessible by all non-car modes of transport and any highway safety and capacity considerations
- whether the Council can demonstrate an adequate supply of housing land
What decided it
The proposal's conflict with the settlement strategy of the adopted and advanced emerging development plan, combined with significant harm to landscape character, outweighed the housing benefits, particularly as the Council was found able to demonstrate an adequate five year housing land supply.
the substantial weight given to housing delivery and significant weight to affordable housing, together with other modest benefits, did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance and the conflict with the adopted and emerging development plan, so the balance tipped against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS1Policy DM1Policy MRTA1Policy MTRA4Policy MTRA5Policy DM10 – DM13Policy CP20Policy DM15Policy DM16Policy DM23Policy NE9Policy NE14Policy CP13Policy CP15Policy CP16Policy NE1Policy NE4Policy NE5Policy CP10Policy DM18Policy SP3Policy H5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 11Paragraph 49Paragraph 115Paragraph 116
- Judgments
- East Riding of Yorkshire v SSLUC [2021] EWHC 3271; Tewkesbury BC v SoSHCLG and anon [2021] EWHC 2782 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed22 May 20266003190Hiawatha, Chapel Road, Swanmore, Hampshire, SO322QA
- Dismissed28 April 20266002399Anthill Farmlands, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Hampshire, PO7 6ES
- Dismissed28 April 20266001209Oakwood, Curdridge Lane, Curdridge, Hampshire, SO32 2BH
- Dismissed5 December 20253361293Land Adjacent Lodge Green, Whiteley Lane, Titchfield, Hampshire, PO15 6RW
- Allowed19 November 20253366618Land at Southwick Road/School Road, Wickham, PO17 6FE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®