Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 February 20263367467

Land at Lanham Lane, Winchester, So22 5JS

outline planning permission for up to 188 houses including custom and self build housing with all matters reserved except for access. This

Authority
Winchester City Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Nicholls H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan settlement strategy, and to the extent relevant, the emerging development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the ecological effects of the proposal
  • whether the site is sufficiently accessible by all non-car modes of transport and any highway safety and capacity considerations
  • whether the Council can demonstrate an adequate supply of housing land

What decided it

The proposal's conflict with the settlement strategy of the adopted and advanced emerging development plan, combined with significant harm to landscape character, outweighed the housing benefits, particularly as the Council was found able to demonstrate an adequate five year housing land supply.

the substantial weight given to housing delivery and significant weight to affordable housing, together with other modest benefits, did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance and the conflict with the adopted and emerging development plan, so the balance tipped against the proposal

Framework references: 187, 11, 49, 115, 116

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DM1, Policy MRTA1, Policy MTRA4, Policy MTRA5, Policy DM10 – DM13, Policy CP20, Policy DM15, Policy DM16, Policy DM23, Policy NE9, Policy NE14, Policy CP13, Policy CP15, Policy CP16, Policy NE1, Policy NE4, Policy NE5, Policy CP10, Policy DM18, Policy SP3, Policy H5

Judgments cited: East Riding of Yorkshire v SSLUC [2021] EWHC 3271; Tewkesbury BC v SoSHCLG and anon [2021] EWHC 2782 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.