Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent Lodge Green, Whiteley Lane, Titchfield, Hampshire, PO15 6RW
Planning appeal 3361293 at Land Adjacent Lodge Green, Whiteley Lane, Titchfield, Hampshire, PO15 6RW (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 5 December 2025 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal on biodiversity, with particular regard to: a) irreplaceable ancient woodland; b) priority habitat; c) protected species; and d) biodiversity net gain.
erection of 2 detached self-build houses with detached garages, parking, turning and landscaping
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- PO15 6RW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The impact of the proposal on biodiversity, with particular regard to: a) irreplaceable ancient woodland; b) priority habitat; c) protected species; and d) biodiversity net gain
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to its location within open countryside and the Council's adopted settlement strategy
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate mitigation for the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs)
What decided it
Material harm to irreplaceable ancient woodland and its buffer zone, which provides a strong reason for refusing the appeal proposal under NPPF paragraph 193(c).
The modest benefits of housing supply, self-build provision and economic benefits were outweighed by material harm to biodiversity (ancient woodland and priority habitat), unsuitability of location within countryside outside the settlement boundary contrary to the adopted settlement strategy, and material harm to the rural character and appearance of the area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy MTRA4Policy CP18Policy CP20Policy DM15Policy DM16Policy DM23Policy DM24Policy CP16Policy CP2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 192Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 April 20266002399Anthill Farmlands, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Hampshire, PO7 6ES
- Dismissed28 April 20266001209Oakwood, Curdridge Lane, Curdridge, Hampshire, SO32 2BH
- Dismissed11 February 20263367467Land at Lanham Lane, Winchester, So22 5JS
- Dismissed14 November 20253366702Land Adjacent to the Down House, Harestock Road, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 6NY
- Dismissed18 July 20253354652Rural Hill, Bighton Lane, Gundleton , Alresford, Hampshire, SO24 9SW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®