Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20213271043

10 Park Lane, Heighington, LINCOLN, LN4 1RF

erection of a rear 2 storey and 1st floor side extension (resubmission of 20/1158/HOUS) in addition to widening of access

Authority
North Kesteven District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cragg D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the alterations to the access would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Heighington Conservation Area with particular regard to its effect on a false acacia tree

What decided it

The private benefits of the access alterations do not outweigh the great weight to be attached to the conservation of the heritage asset, given the risk of deterioration or loss of the false acacia tree which makes a substantial contribution to the conservation area's character.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Heighington Conservation Area through potential deterioration or loss of the false acacia tree was not outweighed by the private benefits of improved access alignment.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy LP17, Policy LP26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.