Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 September 20213271310

Land west of Pennington Lane, Stansted Mountfitchet, CM24 8HZ

outline planning application with all matters reserved except access for up to 168 dwellings (Class C3) including 40% affordable homes, public open space including local equipped area for play, sustainable drainage systems, landscaping and all associated infrastructure and development

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Price J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development proposed on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding landscape, including the significance of the Bentfield Green Conservation Area and other nearby designated and non-designated heritage assets in respect of their setting.

What decided it

The substantial landscape and visual harm to the character and appearance of the site and surrounding countryside, compounded by heritage harm, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the significant benefits of the housing scheme.

The significant benefits (housing land supply, affordable and self-build housing, economic benefits, modest biodiversity and health benefits) were outweighed by the substantial landscape and visual harm and less than substantial/limited heritage harm, such that adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 174, 202, 203, 8, 20, 130

Plan policies cited: GEN2, GEN8, GEN7, ENV3, ENV8, ENV5, GEN6, H9, GEN1, S7, ENV2, ENV1, ENV9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.