Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 November 20213271366

Land Rear Of Park Parade, Acton, W3 9BD

Planning appeal 3271366 at Land Rear Of Park Parade, Acton, W3 9BD (London Borough of Ealing) was allowed on 3 November 2021 by Inspector Sabu R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety.

redevelopment of backland site behind 1-14 Park Parade and 1-11 Lillian Avenue to provide five, two storey dwelling houses with pedestrian access point from Park Parade including associated landscaping, amenity space, refuse and cycle storage

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sabu R
Postcode
W3 9BD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety.

What decided it

The reduction in dwelling numbers from six to five, combined with the dedicated pedestrian access from Park Parade and the Unilateral Undertaking preventing parking permits, meant the scheme would not result in unacceptable impacts on highway and pedestrian safety.

The benefits of providing five new dwellings on a backland site, with improved pedestrian access and management arrangements, outweighed the less than ideal vehicular access arrangement for existing commercial units.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D8 of The London Plan The Spatial Development Strategy For Greater London March 2021Development Management Development Plan Document Adopted December 2013
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

451 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  3. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  4. Dismissed28 July 20263375731
    153-155 Uxbridge Road, London, W7 3SP
  5. Notice upheld24 July 20263351648
    55 Evelyn Grove, Southall, UB1 2BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.