Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld24 July 20263351648

55 Evelyn Grove, SOUTHALL, UB1 2BP

Without planning permission: The construction of a separate self-contained dwelling at the rear and erection of single storey extension to the outbuilding

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Satheesan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions for neighbouring occupiers of 53 Evelyn Grove with particular regard to outlook
  • the living conditions for neighbouring occupiers on Evelyn Grove with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the living conditions for the occupiers of the new dwelling with particular regard to internal floorspace, aspect, privacy, and the provision of amenity space

What decided it

The development caused multiple, cumulative harms to character and appearance and to living conditions of both the new occupiers and neighbours, all in conflict with the development plan, with no material considerations to justify a departure.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan, 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan, 2021, Policy 7.4 of the London Borough of Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, 2013, Policy 7B of the London Borough of Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, 2013, Policy 3.5 of the London Borough of Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, 2013, Table 7D.2 of the London Borough of Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, 2013

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.