Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20213271431

Land North of Howe Lane, Cockfield, Suffolk, IP30 0HA

Planning appeal 3271431 at Land North of Howe Lane, Cockfield, Suffolk, IP30 0HA (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 18 November 2021 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal upon the setting of Grade I listed Church of St Peter and whether any harm identified would be outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

erection of 2 no. detached dwellings and associated garages (with access)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the setting of Grade I listed Church of St Peter and whether any harm identified would be outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal
  • The landscape and character of the area and village as a whole

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade I listed Church of St Peter, to which great weight must be given under paragraph 199 of the Framework, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of two dwellings.

The adverse impacts of harm to a Grade I listed heritage asset and moderate landscape harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of two additional dwellings when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Babergh Local Plan 2006 Policy CN06Babergh Core Strategy 2014 Policy CS15Babergh Local Plan 2006 Policy CN01
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 201Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.