Planning appeal decision
Leigh View Barns, Cuddington Lane, Cuddington, Northwich, CW8 2WD
Planning appeal 3271434 at Leigh View Barns, Cuddington Lane, Cuddington, Northwich, CW8 2WD (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 27 August 2021 by Inspector Taylor K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
conversion and extension of a traditional barn to a dwelling, including the demolition of existing modern farm buildings and associated development
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Taylor K
- Postcode
- CW8 2WD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host building
- The effect of the proposal on the interests of protecting and safeguarding biodiversity, having particular regard to bats
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with disproportionate additions to the original barn, combined with appreciable harm to openness, character and appearance of the host building, and failure to satisfy the Habitats Regulations tests for protected species, with no very special circumstances to justify approval.
The harms arising from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, loss of openness, harm to character and appearance of the host building, and breach of protected species regulations were not clearly outweighed by the limited economic and social benefits, heritage considerations, or removal of unattractive farm buildings, and very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT9Policy DM22Policy ENV4Policy DM44
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 116
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®