Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20213271531

47 Wivelsfield Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 4EN

Planning appeal 3271531 at 47 Wivelsfield Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 4EN (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2021 by Inspector Small M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties.

construction of new 3 bed dwelling with associated landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Small M
Postcode
RH16 4EN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers of the proposed dwelling with regard to outlook and garden area

What decided it

The unacceptable loss of privacy to the residents of Rowan House from the elevated position and extensive glazing of the proposed dwelling outweighed the minimal housing benefits and compliance with other policy considerations.

The limited benefits of an additional dwelling did not outweigh the conflict with the development plan arising from harm to neighbouring living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP26 of the Mid Sussex District Plan 2014 - 2031 (2018)Policy H8 of the Haywards Heath Neighbourhood Plan (2016)Policy E9 of the Haywards Heath Neighbourhood Plan (2016)Policy E13 of the Haywards Heath Neighbourhood Plan (2016)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

42 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Sussex

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015120
    5, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266012781
    11 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
  3. Dismissed9 October 20266010262
    Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266005209
    Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
  5. Dismissed9 October 20266005206
    Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.