Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 August 20213271802

The Old Orchard, Land East of Badgeworth Manor, Badgeworth, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 4UL

Planning appeal 3271802 at The Old Orchard, Land East of Badgeworth Manor, Badgeworth, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 4UL (Tewkesbury Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 August 2021 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the erection of a single detached dwellinghouse with associated parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Connor H
Postcode
GL51 4UL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the site provides a suitable location for residential development having regard to local planning policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to the setting of Badgeworth Manor, a Grade II listed building
  • If inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial but unacceptable harm to the significance of Badgeworth Manor, a designated heritage asset, and would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with these harms not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of a single dwelling in an area of housing need.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness, combined with significant weight to harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significance of the designated heritage asset, was not outweighed by the moderate weight given to housing supply benefits and limited economic benefits, such that very special circumstances did not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD5 JCSPolicy SP2 JCSPolicy SD10 JCSPolicy SD4 JCSPolicy SD6 JCSPolicy SD8 JCSPolicy RES4 TBP (emerging)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 124Paragraph 130Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
Judgments
R (Tate) v Northumberland County Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1519

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

28 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tewkesbury

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed4 August 20266004968
    Land Opposite Woodfold, Down Hatherley Lane, Down Hatherley, GL2 9QB
  2. Dismissed17 April 20266003223
    Plot to the South of Down Hatherley Lane, Down Hatherley, Tewkesbury Borough, Gloucestershire, GL2 9QB
  3. Allowed27 February 20266001066
    Land South of Bentham Lane, Bentham Lane, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 4UT
  4. Dismissed19 January 20266001355
    Greatfield Farm, Shurdington Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 3QX
  5. Allowed27 November 20256000722
    Plymyard, Barrow Nr. Boddington, Cheltenham, Gl51 0TL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.