Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 September 20213271819

Fieldgate Farm, Outside Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD22 9QY

Planning appeal 3271819 at Fieldgate Farm, Outside Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD22 9QY (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was allowed on 28 September 2021 by Inspector Phillips A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appellant has proved on the balance of probability that the use of the property has changed to use as domestic garden on or before 22 September 2010 and that the use then continued for 10 years after the date of the change.

domestic garden

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Phillips A
Postcode
BD22 9QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appellant has proved on the balance of probability that the use of the property has changed to use as domestic garden on or before 22 September 2010 and that the use then continued for 10 years after the date of the change

What decided it

The appellant's evidence, comprising neighbour statements, former owner confirmation, Google Earth imagery, and sales particulars, was sufficiently precise and unambiguous to prove on the balance of probabilities that the land had been continuously used as domestic garden for ten years or more prior to 22 September 2010, and the Council presented insufficient evidence to contradict this.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630; LB Islington v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 2691 (Admin); Thurrock BC v SSE [2002] EWCA Civ 226, [2002] JPL 1278; Swale BC v FFS & Lee [2005] EWCA Civ 1568; [2006] JPL 886

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013460
    Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266012661
    95 Godwin Street, Bradford, BD1 3PP
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266012872
    Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266012715
    247, Girlington Road, Bradford, BD8 9NX
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266010517
    66 Kirkgate, Bradford, BD18 3EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.