Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20213271895

67 Ellesmere Road, Chiswick, LONDON, W4 3EA

erection of new apartment building following demolition of existing dwelling

Authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Willis S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would comply with national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding
  • whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Chiswick House Conservation Area
  • whether the development would encourage future occupiers to use a range of transport modes, with particular regard to the provision of cycle storage facilities
  • whether the development would meet appropriate energy standards

What decided it

The absence of a flood risk assessment and sequential test, combined with the site's location in Flood Zone 3 and the proposal's classification as 'More Vulnerable' use, meant the principle of development could not be accepted and this non-compliance with national planning policy outweighed the scheme's compliance with other development plan policies.

The scheme's compliance with development plan policies on conservation, transport and energy, and neutral factors regarding amenity and parking were outweighed by non-compliance with national planning policy on flood risk steering development away from areas at highest risk of flooding.

Framework references: 162

Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy CC4, Policy EC2, Policy EQ1, Policy EQ2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.