Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20213272303

4 Clifton Road, Liverpool, L6 4BQ

Change of use from 6 x flats (use class C3) to HMO (sui generis) for 12 x bedrooms with en suite accommodation and communal kitchen/dining and lounge area), refuse storage area and secure cycle storage

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Caine M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings with specific regard to noise disturbance
  • whether or not the proposed development would represent the unacceptable loss of a family dwelling

What decided it

The harmful effect on the living conditions of neighbouring residents through noise disturbance arising from the intensity of use by eight unconnected individuals outweighed any benefits and resulted in conflict with the development plan.

The benefits of providing housing choice and improving the appeal building were outweighed by the harm to neighbouring living conditions through noise disturbance.

Framework references: 48, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy H7 of The City of Liverpool Unitary Development Plan (2002), Emerging Plan Policy H10, Emerging Plan Policy H11, Supplementary Planning Guidance Note 7: Conversion of Buildings into Flats and Bedsits (SPG7)

Judgments cited: West Oxfordshire District Council v (1) Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government (2) Rosconn Strategic Land Limited [2018] EWHC 3065 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.