Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 December 20213272497

Heathfield Lodge, 5 Oakleigh Park South, LONDON, N20 9JS

demolition of property behind the retained front façade and rebuilding to include a two-storey rear extension and alteration to the roof/raining of the ridge and insertion of dormer windows at the rear (as previously approved under Ref 20/2341/HSE)

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having specific regard to the locally listed status

What decided it

The existence of an extant consent for a materially similar development, treated as a significant fallback position, combined with the retention of the front façade and sensitive reconstruction of side elevations, meant the proposed development would not harm the heritage significance or character and appearance of the area.

The Inspector balanced the heritage significance of the locally listed building against the fallback position of the extant consent and concluded that the proposed development would sustain the significance of the non-designated heritage asset and not harm character and appearance.

Framework references: 203, 135, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CS5 of the Barnet Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (2012), Policy DM01 of the Barnet Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document (2012), Policy DM06 of the Barnet Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.