Planning appeal decision
12 Dagtail Lane, Redditch, B97 5QT
Planning appeal 3272642 at 12 Dagtail Lane, Redditch, B97 5QT (Redditch Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 September 2021 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of new dwelling and associated works
- Authority
- Redditch Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sibley G
- Postcode
- B97 5QT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing supply and economic activity.
the modest benefits of housing delivery and economic activity did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 8 of the Borough of Redditch Local Plan No.4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 148Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Redditch Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed22 June 20266003258Land Adjacent To The White House, Astwood Lane Astwood Bank, Worcestershire, B96 6PT
- Dismissed8 April 20263375587Land Adj. to Dingleside, Featherbed Lane, Redditch, B97 5QL
- Allowed7 April 2026337608443 Alcester Road, Feckenham, Redditch, B96 6JD
- Split Decision12 June 20243335990Old Yarr, Blaze Lane, Astwood Bank, Worcestershire, B96 6QA
- Dismissed26 January 20233305211Land Adjacent to Feckenham Gardens, Astwood Lane, Feckenham, Worcestershire, B96 6JQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®