Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision12 June 20243335990

Old Yarr, Blaze Lane, Astwood Bank, Worcestershire, B96 6QA

Planning appeal 3335990 at Old Yarr, Blaze Lane, Astwood Bank, Worcestershire, B96 6QA (Redditch Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 June 2024 by Inspector Phillips A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework.

described on the application form as retrospective application for a horticultural store. Appeal 3: APP/Q1825/W/23/3334186 Old Yarr, Blaze Lane, Astwood Bank, Worcestershire B96 6QA

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips A
Postcode
B96 6QA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework
  • If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it (Horse Walker)
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area (Horse Walker)

What decided it

Whether each individual structure amounted to inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, where it did, whether sufficient very special circumstances existed to outweigh the substantial harm to openness and Green Belt purposes.

For the Equine Store, Stable Block and Horse Walker, the substantial harm by reason of inappropriateness and to openness/Green Belt purposes was not clearly outweighed by the limited/little weight personal equestrian and unspecified agricultural benefits, so the appeals failed; for the Dark Blue Dwelling no Green Belt harm arose at all, so the balance did not need to be struck and the appeal succeeded.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 8 of the Borough of Redditch Local Plan No. 4 Adopted January 2017Policy 39 of the Borough of Redditch Local Plan No. 4 Adopted January 2017
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 150
Judgments
Sage v Secretary of State for Transport and the Regions and Maidstone BC [2003] JPL 1299; Devine v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2023] EWCA Civ 601; Burford v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 1493 Admin; R (Amanda Boot) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2017[] EWHC 12 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Redditch Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed22 June 20266003258
    Land Adjacent To The White House, Astwood Lane Astwood Bank, Worcestershire, B96 6PT
  2. Dismissed8 April 20263375587
    Land Adj. to Dingleside, Featherbed Lane, Redditch, B97 5QL
  3. Allowed7 April 20263376084
    43 Alcester Road, Feckenham, Redditch, B96 6JD
  4. Dismissed26 January 20233305211
    Land Adjacent to Feckenham Gardens, Astwood Lane, Feckenham, Worcestershire, B96 6JQ
  5. Dismissed13 September 20213272642
    12 Dagtail Lane, Redditch, B97 5QT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.