Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 August 20213272650

30 Parliament Street, Upholland, upholland, WN8 0LN

Increase in height of existing brick wall along front (western) boundary to 1.6m. Erection of metal shed and decking to rear of dwelling. Erection of 1.83m fence along eastern boundary, extending westwards towards the dwelling and including a gate

Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ellison H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the significance of heritage assets, including the setting of the Grade II listed building and whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Up Holland Conservation Area, including in respect of the impact on trees.

What decided it

The private benefits of improved security and privacy do not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building and the conservation area caused by the proposed boundary treatments and structures.

The private benefits of improved security, privacy and safety were weighed against the less than substantial harm to the heritage assets, with the harm outweighing the benefits.

Plan policies cited: Policy EN2, Policy EN4, Policy GN3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.