Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 December 20213272707

6 Ethelden Road, London, W12 7BG

a hip to gable roof and proposed mansard loft extension to rear gable and outrigger

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Indermaur S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the hip to gable roof extension on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area, including the Ingersoll and Arminger Conservation Area
  • The effect of the hip to gable roof extension on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No 4 Ethelden Road, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area caused by the incongruous hip to gable roof extension, which would diminish the symmetry and rhythm of the terraced streetscene, could not be outweighed by any public benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the proposal would only provide private benefit through increased accommodation with no evidence of necessity for the property's optimum viable use.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Policy HO11, Key principle CAG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.