Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20213272939

5 Whittle Lane, HEYWOOD, OL10 2RB

new storage building for machinery used in the maintenance of 7 acres of grounds consisting mainly of meadow type grassland and grassy verges and trees to the site boundaries including mini-tractor, sit-on mowers

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Wilson L
Postcode
OL10 2RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The activity of maintaining grassland for amenity purposes does not constitute agriculture within the statutory definition, so the building cannot fall within the agricultural exception to Green Belt policy, and the harm to openness and inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight given to equipment storage needs and neutral considerations regarding design and conservation area impact.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy G4 of the Rochdale Adopted Core Strategy (2016)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.