Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 August 20213273056

Adams Ironmongers, 112 Holland Road, Sutton Coldfield, B72 1RE

Planning appeal 3273056 at Adams Ironmongers, 112 Holland Road, Sutton Coldfield, B72 1RE (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 23 August 2021 by Inspector Watson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

the creation of 2no. self-contained apartments on upper floors, erection of single storey, first and second floor rear extension and new access stairs

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Watson S
Postcode
B72 1RE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, caused by the scale, form and appearance of the proposed extensions, outweighed the modest weight attributable to the provision of two additional housing units.

The modest weight given to housing provision was outweighed by the significant weight given to the harm to character and appearance of the area

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Plan 2031: Birmingham Development PlanParagraphs 3.14C-D of The Birmingham Plan: Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

50 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012986
    Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266011902
    Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266013662
    22 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266015503
    60 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266015146
    9Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.