Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20213273267

132 The Crossways, Hounslow, TW5 0JR

Planning appeal 3273267 at 132 The Crossways, Hounslow, TW5 0JR (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 8 November 2021 by Inspector Wilde J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers with respect to amenity space and light and outlook.

a new one bedroom (2 person) dwelling with parking and amenity space

Authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilde J
Postcode
TW5 0JR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers with respect to amenity space and light and outlook
  • Highway safety
  • The character of the area due to increased activity
  • Whether or not the proposed development would be of sustainable design

What decided it

The significant conflicts with Policy SC5 regarding inadequate and poor-quality outdoor amenity space and with Policy CC2 regarding poor outlook, combined with the unsafe parking arrangement contrary to NPPF paragraph 110, outweighed the acceptable character impact.

The conflicts with the development plan regarding outdoor amenity space and outlook, and with the Framework regarding highway safety, significantly outweighed the acceptable character and appearance impact and any potential economic or social benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SC5Policy CC2Policy CC1Policy SC7Policy EQ1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 110

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

495 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011171
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266007899
    92 Windmill Road, Brentford, TW8 9NA
  3. Dismissed20 July 20266006466
    88A Crispen Road, Feltham, TW13 6QR
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266006681
    395 Twickenham Road, Isleworth, TW7 7ES
  5. Dismissed9 July 20266002796
    163 Gunnersbury Lane, Ealing, Acton, W3 8LJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.